Home / Case Studies / Robotic Tin Can Palletizing
Engineering Design Case Study

Robotic Tin Can Palletizing

Converting continuous can flow into repeatable 42-can pallet layers without disrupting the filler

6-Axis RobotMagnetic Matrix GripperPLC + HMI
Complete robotic tin-can palletizing cell
Complete robotic tin-can palletizing cell
30
cans/min production rate
42
cans per matrix (6x7)
212kg
operating payload
≥300kg
indicated robot class
84s
per complete matrix
~15%
illustrative robot utilization

The brief: palletize 30 cans/min without disrupting the filler -- by converting continuous can flow into repeatable, fully verified 42-can pallet layers.

Two-layer buffering isolates the filler from the robot

Controlled accumulation zones let upstream production continue while each 42-can pickup matrix forms and is verified. A minimum working buffer of two matrix-loads (84 cans) absorbs short stoppages without ever touching the filler's own cadence.

Can accumulation and infeed conveyor
Can accumulation and infeed conveyor

Sizing the robot from the full load case

42 cans at 3.5 kg each is 147 kg of product, plus a 55 kg magnetic gripper and 10 kg of auxiliary equipment -- 212 kg operating payload. Applying a 1.25x design factor for acceleration and dynamics brings the design load to 265 kg, pointing to a robot class of 300 kg or more before reach, inertia, and duty-cycle checks.

Heavy-payload six-axis robot with magnetic matrix gripper
Heavy-payload six-axis robot with magnetic matrix gripper

One synchronized, verification-led cell

Product flow and pallet flow stay distinct, then synchronize through PLC and robot permissives: no matrix release, robot pick, or pallet placement proceeds without an explicit position and status confirmation. The result is a cell where jam, count, and accumulation states are PLC conditions -- not operator judgment calls.

Synchronized robotic palletizing cell
Synchronized robotic palletizing cell

Capacity check: substantial margin at target rate

A complete 42-can matrix becomes available every 84 seconds at 30 cans/min, against a non-overlapped robot movement budget of roughly 13 seconds -- an illustrative utilization near 15%. Buffering governs the cadence while the robot itself retains headroom for slip-sheet moves and future rate increases.

Infeed and matrix-forming station
Infeed and matrix-forming station
Capability Demonstrated

What this proves about the approach

✓

Buffered design keeps the filler running independent of robot cycles

✓

Robot class sized with margin, not picked to the bare minimum

✓

Explicit PLC/robot permissives replace operator judgment calls

✓

Delivery path scoped from freeze through FAT/SAT to site acceptance

Illustrative engineering case study. Final can geometry, filled weight, magnetic pull testing, line rate, and approved pallet pattern remain customer-confirmed release gates for detailed design.

Ready to scope a system like this for your line?

Request a Quote